IP case law Court of Justice

Referral C-46/23 (Újpesti Polgármesteri Hivatal, 31 Jan 2023)



1. Must Article 58(2), in particular subparagraphs (c), (d) and (g), of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) (‘GDPR’) be interpreted as meaning that the national supervisory authority, in exercise of its corrective powers, may order the data controller or processor to erase unlawfully processed personal data even in the absence of an express request by the data subject under Article 17(1) of the GDPR?

2. In the event that the answer to the first question is that the supervisory authority may order the data controller or processor to erase unlawfully processed personal data even in the absence of a request by the data subject, is that so irrespective of whether or not the personal data were obtained from the data subject?’


Case details on the CJEU website (external link)


Disclaimer